When Legacy Meets Startup: Why Marriott and Sonder Couldn’t Make It Work

1. Background: What Was the Deal?

In August 2024, Marriott International announced a licensing agreement with Sonder, a bold move to link Marriott’s vast brand and loyalty infrastructure with Sonder’s flexible, apartment-style accommodation model.

Under the agreement:

• Sonder properties would be integrated into Marriott’s network and into the Marriott Bonvoy loyalty program.

• More than ~9,000 units (rooms/apartments) were expected to join the Marriott system.

• For Marriott, this was part of their “Apartments by Marriott Bonvoy”/flex-stay growth strategy. For Sonder, this was a lifeline and a leap in distribution and credibility.

2. What Happened: The Termination

Fast forward to November 9, 2025: Marriott announced that the agreement is terminated effective immediately, citing a “default” by Sonder.

Key implications:

• Sonder properties are no longer affiliated with Marriott Bonvoy and cannot be booked through Marriott booking channels.

• Marriott will contact guests who booked via its own channels to manage their bookings; guests who booked via third-party intermediaries are urged to contact those agencies.

• Marriott’s previously projected net room growth for the year has been revised downward (from about 5% to around 4.5%) due in part to this termination.

3. Why Did It Fail? (From a Hospitality & Revenue Perspective)

Several factors (both macro and strategic) underpin the breakdown:

• Business model mismatch: Sonder operated on an asset-light but lease-heavy “convert apartments/units to short-term” model. That creates structural risk during downturns. 

• Operational & financial stress: Many reports show Sonder was facing significant losses, lease burdens, and revenue pressure. The “default” cited by Marriott likely refers to a breach of contractual or financial obligations on Sonder’s part. 

• Brand & guest experience alignment: Marriott’s brand and loyalty ecosystem depend on consistency, standards, and trust. Integrating a “flex-stay/apartment” business model has latent operational complexity (uniform service levels, compliance, integration of PMS/CRS, loyalty data, etc.). The speed of integration may have masked gaps.

• Strategic timing / risk exposure: The deal was announced in August 2024 and terminated in November 2025 (barely over a year). That is a short runway for a complex integration of this type, especially given the broader economic/occupancy pressures in hospitality post-COVID.

  
  

4. Impacts & Fallout

For Marriott

• Short-term brand risk: Guests booked via Marriott channels into Sonder properties are caught in limbo, cancellations, rebookings, and who bears cost?

• Growth strategy setback: The termination eats into the apartment-style expansion pipeline and forces Marriott to revisit how it enters non-traditional stay formats.

• Loyalty implications: For Bonvoy members, the trust factor matters, booking a “Marriott-branded” stay and then being told you’re not in the network damages reputation.

For Sonder

• A major credibility blow: Losing Marriott as a partner signals severe distress to investors, landlords, and guests.

• Financial stress intensifies: With the partnership gone and default in play, Sonder’s ability to renegotiate leases, finance operations, or maintain occupancy is compromised. (Some reports suggest bankruptcy risk.)

• Guest & owner disruption: Guests with ongoing or upcoming bookings are being cancelled or asked to vacate, and owners/managers suddenly find contractual stability gone.

For the industry

• This deal becomes a cautionary tale: The marriage of legacy hotel operators and agile apartment-style operators is not trivial. Systems, standards, loyalty expectations, and legal/contractual frameworks all matter.

• It raises questions about where the “extended stay / apartment” segment sits in hotel brand portfolios, how much of it is really hotel-brand compatible, vs. requiring a separate operating architecture.

• It puts a spotlight on “alternative stay” strategies (apartment-hotels, serviced apartments, flexible leases) and the risk of scaling them via big-brand partnerships without full risk/operational alignment.

5. What Are the Lessons (Especially for Hospitality Revenue & Distribution Pros)

Given your role at EPIC and interest in revenue/distribution for boutique hotels, here are some takeaways:

• Brand-fit matters: When integrating new formats (apartment-style, serviced flats, hybrid models), ensure that brand standards, loyalty alignment, PMS/CRS compatibility, guest experience expectations are fully scoped.

• Operational execution is key: Beyond the headline agreement, the backend systems (bookings, loyalty points, data flows, cancellation policies, guest support) must be robust. Risk builds when integration is shallow.

• Risk modelling in revenue forecasts: When projecting growth via new partnerships or formats, build in downside scenarios (e.g., default/termination, brand disaffiliation, guest cancellation). Marriott’s revision downward from ~5 % to ~4.5 % net room growth is a concrete example.

• Communication and guest retention are critical: Loyalty guests expect “Marriott quality.” Sudden changes or cancellations erode trust. If you’re navigating boutique/hybrid formats, think deeply about how you protect guest loyalty and experience.

• Speed vs. readiness trade-off: The thin margin between announcement and termination (~1 year) underscores how rapid rollout without full ramp can lead to breakdown. For boutique/hospitality players expanding into new formats, measured growth may reduce risk.

• Asset-light doesn’t mean risk-free: The apartment-hotel model often seems lower-capex but still carries lease, compliance, and operations risk. Sonder’s model had similarities to a “WeWork-style” risk profile.

6. Looking Ahead: What This Means for Marriott, Sonder, and the Sector

• Marriott will likely be more cautious in future partnerships of this type, perhaps favouring deeper internal capability or partners with proven operational track records.

• Sonder’s future is uncertain, the termination and default raise questions about its ability to continue operations and preserve brand value.

• The “alternative stay” push (serviced apartments, extended stays, hybrid living) remains strong, but the industry will likely recalibrate on how such formats align with mainstream hotel portfolios and loyalty ecosystems.

• Boutique hotel owners and revenue strategists may view this as an opportunity: the pullback of a large operator from such formats might open space for independent/brand-affiliated boutique properties to define differentiated stay experiences with more control, fewer dilution risks.

7. Conclusion

The breakup between Marriott and Sonder is more than just a corporate licensing termination, it’s a microcosm of the pressures at play in hospitality today: evolving guest expectations, alternative stay formats, brand-loyalty intersection, operational risk, and revenue/distribution strategy.

The take-home is clear: growth through new formats is compelling but only when the brand proposition, operational backbone, guest experience, and risk-model align. The Marriott-Sonder “experiment” shows how fast the dream can pivot into disruption.

Stay ahead of the curve. Subscribe to EPIC Trends for bold insights on hospitality, AI, and revenue strategy, crafted for leaders shaping the future of our industry.

epic-rev.com